When Scripture Challenges What We Have Always Believed

Letting Go of Tradition Without Letting Go of Faith

Michael Antonio Jeter

The Apostolic Record

—  •  —

There are beliefs we learn from Scripture, and there are beliefs we learn so early, hear so often, and associate so deeply with faith that we eventually assume they came directly from Scripture. The difference is not always obvious. Few subjects reveal this more clearly than what Christians have traditionally been taught about death, heaven, and resurrection.

For generations, Christians have comforted one another with familiar words: a loved one has died and is now in heaven; a mother or father is looking down on the family; a faithful believer has gone home to be with the Lord; one day we too will die, go to heaven, and see them again. These expressions are repeated at funerals, preached from pulpits, written in sympathy cards, and passed from parents to children. Because they are attached to some of the most painful and intimate moments of human life, questioning them can feel almost like questioning the faith itself.

Yet an examined faith must be willing to ask a simple question even when the subject is emotionally difficult: Where does Scripture actually say this?

That question is not an attack on faith. It is an act of faith, because it asks whether we trust the testimony of Scripture enough to allow it to correct even those beliefs that have comforted us for most of our lives. If YAH has promised something different from what tradition has taught us, then our security should ultimately rest in what YAH promised, not in what we inherited.

Why Some Traditions Are Harder to Examine

Some teachings can be reconsidered without much personal cost. If we discover that we misunderstood an obscure historical event or interpreted a minor passage incorrectly, changing our position may be relatively easy. Death is different because the question is never merely theoretical. It reaches into our memories of parents, spouses, children, friends, teachers, and others we have loved and buried. Eventually, it reaches us.

That emotional weight is completely understandable, but it also means that this subject requires unusual care. We should not ask Scripture merely to confirm the picture of the afterlife that we already need to be true. The better question is what YAH has actually promised, because the truth of that promise is where peace must finally rest.

The Method: Let the Witnesses Speak

The method used at The Apostolic Record is intentionally uncomplicated. Before asking what a denomination teaches, what a creed declares, what a theologian concluded, or what we learned as children, we begin with the biblical witnesses. We ask what Moses establishes, what the Prophets testify, what Yahshua says, and what the Apostles teach. Only after hearing those witnesses do we attempt to construct the doctrine.

This matters because Scripture should not have to contradict Scripture in order for our theology to survive. When two passages appear to pull in different directions, the answer is not to choose the passage we prefer and silence the other. Nor should we casually call one passage literal and another figurative simply because the distinction protects a conclusion we already hold. We examine the language, context, genre, and the larger scriptural record until the witnesses can stand together.

A useful principle follows from that method: a distinction necessary to preserve an interpretation must itself be established by the scriptural record. Legitimate distinctions reconcile evidence; invented distinctions merely protect conclusions. That rule applies to every position, including our own. If Scripture overturns an interpretation, the interpretation must change. Scripture does not.

What Does Scripture Say About Death?

Ecclesiastes tells us that “the dead know not any thing” and that their love, hatred, and envy have perished (Ecclesiastes 9:5–6). Psalm 146 describes a man whose breath departs, who returns to the earth, and whose thoughts or plans perish in that very day (Psalm 146:4). Daniel speaks of those who “sleep in the dust of the earth” and later awake (Daniel 12:2). When Lazarus died, Yahshua told his disciples that their friend was sleeping and that he was going to awaken him. When they misunderstood the expression, Yahshua stated plainly, “Lazarus is dead” (John 11:11–14).

The Apostles continue the same resurrection-centered language. Paul comforts grieving believers not by telling them that their dead loved ones are already consciously living in heaven, but by directing them to the return of Messiah: “the dead in Christ shall rise first” (1 Thessalonians 4:16). In 1 Corinthians 15 he calls Messiah the firstfruits of those who have fallen asleep and then gives the order: “Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ’s at his coming” (1 Corinthians 15:23).

That sequence deserves careful attention. Earlier people, including Lazarus, had been restored to mortal life and later died again. Messiah’s resurrection was different. He was raised beyond the dominion of death. Paul then says that at the resurrection the dead will be raised incorruptible and mortality will put on immortality. Only then does he declare that death is swallowed up in victory (1 Corinthians 15:52–54). In other words, the firstfruits have risen, while the harvest awaits the appointed time.

Why Resurrection Matters

At this point a natural question arises. If a believer dies but remains consciously alive in heaven, possessing identity, memory, awareness, fellowship, and personal existence for years or even centuries before Messiah returns, what exactly is resurrection accomplishing?

Traditional Christian theology has developed an answer: the body dies while the conscious person continues to exist apart from it, and at the resurrection that person receives a transformed body. We should state that position fairly. The claim is not simply that a decayed corpse is temporarily reconstructed for a theatrical display. The traditional argument is that embodied human existence is restored and perfected.

But once that distinction becomes necessary, our method requires us to examine the distinction itself. Where does Scripture establish that the dead body knows nothing while the actual human person remains consciously alive elsewhere? Ecclesiastes does not say that the corpse knows nothing while the person continues thinking in another realm. It says that the dead know nothing. If we wish to divide the dead human being into an unconscious body and a separately conscious personal subject, that division must be demonstrated rather than assumed.

This is why resurrection cannot be reduced to a secondary event added to an afterlife that has already been underway. In the apostolic proclamation, resurrection is central to the victory over death. The person dies, and YAH raises the person. The hope is not that human beings possess something within themselves that death cannot touch; the hope is that YAH possesses power that death cannot defeat.

The Fear of “Nothingness”

For someone who has always believed that death means immediately opening one’s eyes in heaven, the biblical language of sleep can initially sound unsettling. The thought may arise: If I am not conscious after death, what happens to me during all those years? Will I still be myself when I awaken? Does unconscious death mean that I somehow disappear?

Perhaps the question becomes less frightening when we recognize that an unconscious person does not experience the interval of unconsciousness. Think of ordinary dreamless sleep, or even general anesthesia. The comparison is only an illustration, not biological proof of what death is. Yet it helps us understand the subjective point. A person may close his eyes, experience no awareness of the intervening hours, and then awaken without having consciously experienced the passage of time.

If death is the sleep from which Scripture says YAH will awaken the dead, the believer does not experience centuries of darkness or consciously wait inside a grave. The final conscious moment belongs to this present life, and the next conscious moment is awakening. What initially sounded frightening can therefore become remarkably peaceful. The believer does not need to keep himself consciously alive through death. He needs to trust the One who promised to raise him.

Job expresses this confidence with extraordinary force. He anticipates the destruction of his body and yet declares that in his flesh he will see Elohim, that he himself will see and his own eyes will behold (Job 19:25–27). His hope does not depend upon preserving his own consciousness through death. His confidence rests upon the ability of his Redeemer to restore him. Identity is safe because YAH does not lose the person whom death takes.

The question therefore becomes deeper than the mechanics of consciousness. Do we trust YAH enough to believe that the Creator who gave life can restore it? Must some part of us remain independently conscious in order for YAH to remember who we are? Scripture’s resurrection hope says no. The person does not have to defeat death in order for YAH to defeat death.

And Where Does Scripture Say We Go to Heaven?

The same method should be applied to another deeply rooted Christian assumption. Countless believers have been taught that the righteous die and go to heaven. In popular Christian thought, they may remain there until Messiah returns, be resurrected, and then continue with him, with heaven still understood as their true home. Yet when we turn from the familiar story to the biblical sequence, the emphasis looks quite different.

Scripture repeatedly directs attention toward resurrection, Messiah’s return, his reign, judgment, the defeat of death, and the renewal of creation. Revelation does not conclude with redeemed humanity permanently escaping the earth for heaven. John sees “the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven” (Revelation 21:2). Immediately afterward comes the declaration, “Behold, the tabernacle of God is with men, and he will dwell with them” (Revelation 21:3).

The direction of the final movement is worth noticing. The New Jerusalem descends. Creation is renewed. Elohim dwells with humanity. The biblical story culminates not in humanity permanently abandoning creation, but in the defeat of death and the establishment of YAH’s dwelling among His people.

This does not mean that every passage traditionally associated with heaven can simply be dismissed. John 14, Luke 23, Philippians 1, 2 Corinthians 5, and the heavenly scenes in Revelation all deserve serious examination in their own contexts. The method must remain consistent: no passage is discarded because it is inconvenient, but neither is an inherited interpretation allowed to control the witnesses before they testify.

The question remains straightforward: Where do Moses, the Prophets, Yahshua, and the Apostles establish that the permanent destiny of redeemed humanity is conscious residence in heaven beginning at death? If that proposition is true, Scripture should be able to establish it. If Scripture instead presents death as sleep, resurrection at Messiah’s coming, the reign of Messiah, renewed creation, the descent of New Jerusalem, and Elohim dwelling with humanity, then we should be willing to reconsider the story we have traditionally been told.

How Tradition Becomes Scripture in Our Minds

None of this requires us to accuse sincere believers of dishonesty. Tradition is powerful precisely because sincere people can inherit it from other sincere people. A child hears a teaching from a parent, the parent heard it from a pastor, the pastor learned it from a theological tradition, and eventually the teaching becomes so familiar that few people remember to ask where the chain began. Familiarity begins to feel like biblical authority.

That is why examining inherited doctrine can be both intellectually and emotionally difficult. Changing a belief about death may also change the picture we have carried for decades of people we love. We may have imagined them presently watching us, speaking with one another, or waiting for our arrival in heaven. Discovering that Scripture may describe their condition differently can initially feel like losing something.

But truth does not take away anything YAH has actually promised. It removes what He did not promise so that our confidence can rest more securely in what He did. If those we love are in the memory of YAH and are among those whom He raises unto life, then death has not placed them beyond His reach. Their hope and ours rest in the same place: the faithfulness of the Creator and the promised resurrection.

Peace on the Other Side of Examination

An examined faith does not begin by deciding what must be true and then searching Scripture for passages capable of supporting it. It gathers the witnesses, listens before explaining them, distinguishes what the text says from what tradition has taught us that it means, identifies assumptions, and tests every necessary distinction. When passages appear to disagree, it refuses to make one witness erase another, because the Scriptures cannot be broken.

That principle should not frighten a believer. There is freedom in knowing that faith does not require us to defend every doctrine we inherited. Faith requires us to trust YAH enough to follow His testimony even when it overturns something familiar.

And there can be profound peace on the other side of that examination. The believer does not need an indestructible consciousness of his own in order to be secure. He does not need to understand how the Creator will restore what has returned to dust, nor does he need to experience the passage of time between death and resurrection. He needs to know the One who made the promise.

Death is real, but it is not greater than YAH. The believer may close his eyes without experiencing the interval that follows and awaken when the Creator calls the dead to life. The hope is therefore not, “I cannot truly die.” It is something far greater: “Even if I die, YAH can raise me.”

Perhaps this is why the biblical doctrine of resurrection can bring such peace once we allow it to speak for itself. Our confidence is no longer placed in our own supposed ability to remain alive somewhere beyond death. It is placed entirely in YAH. The Creator who gave life has not surrendered His creation to the grave, and the final biblical picture is not of His people fleeing permanently to another realm, but of death defeated, creation renewed, New Jerusalem descending, and the tabernacle of Elohim with humanity.

That is not less hope than tradition offered us. It is a greater hope, because it requires no confidence in an immortal part of ourselves. It asks only that we trust the One who has promised the resurrection.