Death, Consciousness, and the Forgotten Hope of Scripture

Yah established His appointed times in Torah. Yahshua lived within that sacred calendar, the apostles continued to speak its language, and the Prophets depict appointed worship in the coming Kingdom. So when—and by whose authority—did Christianity replace that calendar with another?

Yom Kippur confronts a truth that neither sacrifice nor grace abolishes: our sins testify against us. From Leviticus and the Prophets to Yahshua and the Apostolic witness, Scripture establishes that atonement provides reconciliation—but reconciliation does not abolish repentance, covenant fidelity, intercession, or final judgment.

Does the worship, honor, glory, dominion, and exaltation bestowed upon Yahshua establish that he is Yah—the one true Elohim? This examination tests that proposition against the complete biblical record under one governing rule: Scripture cannot be broken.

For the Scriptural believer, the question is therefore narrower than whether near-death experiences occur. They plainly occur as reported human experiences. The question is whether those experiences can legitimately be used as evidence that human consciousness continues after death.

Letting Go of Tradition Without Letting Go of Faith

A forensic apologetic for the singular deity of YAH, the appointed Messiahship of Yahshua, and the apostolic rejection of later Trinitarian ontology.

Scripture commands the petitioner to approach Yah in faith—but what exactly must be believed? This examination considers unwavering faith, obedience, and the sovereignty of Yah’s will in answered prayer.

If Torah Was Suspended Between Messiah’s First Coming and His Kingdom, Where Is the Suspension Order?

Acts 21 records a direct accusation that Paul taught Jews to forsake Moses—and a public act intended to demonstrate that the accusation was false. This forensic examination asks whether the traditional Torah-abolishing interpretation of Paul can survive Paul’s own testimony and conduct.